<aside> 💡
</aside>
Harry is a satellite founder who operates autonomously and independently through his synthetic single family office (sfo) Youngmore 👀
His sole focus is ‘aligning all intelligence’ through the products and protocols he has designed and built 🧐
His venture career started nearly 15 years ago at the age of 18 🚀
🚀
🤑
🌐
solve the productivity paradox
stabilise the global economy
supercharge our shared reality
Realisation of Keynes' 15 Hour Work-Week
Re-Satisfaction of Rodrik's Globalisation Trilemma
Re-Circumvention of Kant's Ontological Indeterminacy Problem
decks ~ econ (🤫) ノ social (🤫)
<aside> 💡
satellite founder ~ investor x endogenous ideas ノ [creative](<https://www.tiktok.com/@dr.jordan.b.peterson/video/7553056429557533968>) + thesis-driven
Rule:** Founders have a ground-view, GPs have a helicopter view, LPs have a [satellite view](<https://docsend.com/view/jiryti9gbpacvgdg>)Exception:** Elon operates at the satellite level as a founder - running multiple, complimentary companies simultaneouslyBlock:** These schedules are often gruelling, and the capital requirement is very highUnlock:** AI - ‘future Elons’ can self-identify, build, and scale more quickly and less expensively than ever beforeRe-founding:** If Elon were to start again today, he would create one company with multiple, complimentary subsidiariesTitle:** His title would be **Exec Chair** - he is the philosopher, he brings in a CEO as the 'super-agent'Lesson:** AI enables and normalises execution at the highest altitudes possible - the better the AI, the higher the altitudeNote: investor x exogenous ideas = venture capitalist
</aside>| Types of Single Family Office | Embryonic | Synthetic | Mature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Action 💪 | Evaluating your life’s purpose | Executing the crystallised plan | Exploring wider opportunities |
| Financial Stability 🏦 | None ノ TSP with AI | Synthetic SFO fees | SFO fees |
<aside> 💡
synthetic sfo ~ the stage when you’ve determined how you'll build wealth, but still rely on patrons
</aside>
“Do employers look for creative people?” “No, not generally. There's increasing demand in corporations for creative people. But the problem with being creative is that you're useless at the bottom of the dominance hierarchy. You're not there to think outside the box. You're there to learn what you're supposed to do and implement it. Creative people, that isn't what they do. What happens, though, to companies is that because they filter all the creative people out at the bottom and then people start to rise up to the top, you really need creative people at the top because they are the entrepreneurial types, and they're the ones, for example, in law firms, the more entrepreneurial ones are the ones that bring in all the business. But it's also very difficult to nurse them within any system because systems do not nurture creativity. The artist is always the person who stands outside the structure or maybe builds his or her own structure, which is also why it's hard to evaluate creative people. You can't - if they're operating within the confines of a system that has an evaluative structure, they're not creative.” - Jordan B. Peterson
